
Oh
dear, but its dreary, this ongoing educational debate. I am an educator,
and like a plumber who goes home and avoids pipes, I usually eschew any talk
about the "business" of education, but here goes. Do I agree with
Bernard Shaw? No, obviously, but part of me knows what he means. Obviously
Shaw learned to read and write, learned "the basics", read Cicero,
studied grammar, and jumped through the hoops of algebra, but none of this
was of any apparent value to him. He didnt consciously remember any
of it, and so he "learned nothing". Whatever he learned remained
unattached to any meaningful experience of life. A lot of that sort of thing
still goes on in school.
What
do I remember from school? Strangely enough, I dont remember what I
"learned", but I remember the day Warren got sprayed by a skunk
on his way to school. I must have been in third grade. Warren was a different
sort of boy. What little we knew of him contributed to the overall impression
of a broken home. He had some sort of southern drawl, like my cousins from
Fort Wayne, and he wore a rumpled blue and brown flannel shirt, like a cowboy.
His hair was thinning and he was always earnest. Looking back, I suppose he
must have been bowed down with the responsibilities of the world from an early
age. I picture him now driving a truck, if hes not in jail. He is a
divorced chain-smoking grandfather, in my imagination. But on that day, back
in the early sixties, in the backwater town of northeast lower Michigan, Warren
came to school with a stink so bad he had to be sent home. It was either him
or us. I still remember that sulphurous smell, and the way it lingered long
after he left us. Some time shortly thereafter, Warren left us for good.
What
else do I remember from that year? There was a canvas tarp, frozen stiff outside
the school in an out-of-the-way corner. It was probably December. The ground
was hard and there was some ice. It was morning, still dark, and none of my
third grade friends seemed to be there yet. Some snow had drifted around the
corner of the building and collected on the tarp, in the folds, on top of
some heavy seams of trapped ice. Whatever was under the tarp was not going
to be easily revealed because the canvas itself was frozen and heavy with
permeated ice.
But
there I was, putting the toe of my galoshes under the tarp and lifting, kicking,
and lifting some more. It was like some sort of stick under there, and it
would lift so high, and then flop down again. And so I bent down and peeled
the tarp back, and lifted it. The tarp came away from what was under it, and
what I found was a calfs leg, sticking straight out at me. Somebody
had brought the calf to school, so the big kids could dissect it, I suppose.
My god, what was it doing there? I remember this almost more than anything
else because it intrudes into the daily routine and shakes me still.
What
else happened that year? Our teacher read us "Horton Hears a Who",
which at that time was probably a brand new book. I was asked to deliver the
book back into the safe keeping of Mrs. Perkins, the fourth grade teacher,
when we had finished it. "Tell her we enjoyed it one hundred and one
percent," said my teacher, which was the punch line from the book. I
conveyed the message, without much conviction, but Mrs. Perkins was delighted
nonetheless. Later that day, on the way home from school, Jack Badgero sidled
up to me with a pocket knife. "Bring your knife tomorrow morning, and
well have a knife fight." He meant it. He was older than me by
a couple of years.
The
whole family was trouble. Jack had red-rimmed eyes, and he always stood too
close. He smelled of glue, or something. He had a perpetual leering grin,
and a malicious sneer in his voice The next morning he accosted me outside
school. He appeared to have been waiting for me, specifically. When I told
him I had not brought the knife, he pushed me, called me a "chicken shit",
and warned me to not forget to bring the knife tomorrow. So it went on for
about a week. Eventually my mother got wind of it, and stormed up to the school
to put a stop to this nonsense. But Jack never stopped leering at me.
Telling
these three little stories, pulled almost randomly from one year of my school
life, makes it sound as if my world consisted of a series of sinister Far
Side events. And yet, I remember that the emotional backdrop to these events
was one of security and comfort. I do not consciously remember very much about
the discrete learning events of my school life, and yet, here I am, educated.
Somebody must have done it. Did it happen because of school, or despite it?
I do not know what the day-to-day fabric of school life actually is like anymore,
for my young daughter, from the point of view of a child, because now I am
an adult. But I suspect that what one "remembers" from school, what
one consciously recalls learning, is entirely different from what teachers
teach.
I
never know exactly what my students will remember five, ten or twenty years
from now, which, by the way, is the real measure of the value of an education,
but whatever they remember will be attached to some emotional event, because
otherwise they will probably forget it. The truth of a thing always shines
through, and truth is connected to genuine feeling. Truth has nothing to do
with facts or the fragmented texture of "information" as it surrounds
us today. Truth is also not the same as skills, although skills help us to
get at truth.
It
is very difficult to break through the barriers of commercialism and hype
which surround our kids nowadays, and yet, underneath it all, they are crying
out for a genuine experience of life. They are crying out for the truths which
are revealed through literature. It does not surprise me that Wordsworth speaks
to them, or Shakespeare, or Thornton Wilder, or Arthur Miller. Why should
they not want to hear? There is something more than mere information encoded
in Shakespeare; students enjoy Shakespeare because he embodies universal truth.
We all crave truth and beauty, and we are surrounded by so much ugliness and
lying. Who wouldnt enjoy a jolt of unadulterated truth? Truth is "the
pause that refreshes," to borrow (ironically) a phrase from advertising.
Today
we are in the midst of a technological revolution so vast that it threatens
to undermine and redefine what it means to be human. Wordsworth lived at the
beginning of another revolution, the Industrial Revolution, which completely
and irrevocably changed the way man lived in nature. Bruce Catton, in his
excellent autobiography "Waiting for the Morning Train: an American Boyhood"
writes eloquently of the tail end of that revolution as it played out here
in Michigan and how Benzonia Academy saw its mission:
"At
a time when the state as a whole was waging war on the visible surrounding
wilderness this school saw itself as waging war on the wilderness of ignorance,
whose tangled undergrowth was also visible out in the clearings the lumbermen
were creating. The sense of mission was powerful. The forests were being destroyed
for a purpose: so that men and women could have better lives after the forests
had been removed. That the physical obstacles to achievement were being taken
away was interesting but not particularly important. What mattered was to
teach men and women that the obstacles to their mental and spiritual development
could be destroyed. Man had control of his future, but that control did not
in the least depend on improved machinery or mechanical progress."
If you have
not read Cattons book, get it and read it. It is as true today as when
it was written in 1972, towards the end of Cattons life, and at the
dawning of awareness of the environmental movement. "Waiting for the
Morning Train" is an extended meditation on the folly of "progress",
with the tenderness of Cattons childhood memories before the cataclysmic
events of World War One. "We lived in Indian summer and mistook it for
spring. Winter lay just ahead, when we thought June was on the way."
The
true value and meaning of education, the nurturing of the soul, the folly
of technological "progress" - all these themes have even more resonance
today as we stand at the brink of the new millennium. What can we teach our
children? What do we learn at school? What do we ultimately remember? What
I hope we can learn is that the human soul cries out to be fed with truth
and knowledge, and that knowledge, apart from any narrow utilitarian value,
will enhance life. Knowledge is power, truth is comforting and eternal, and
the endless flow of information has nothing to do with knowledge. "The
flow of messages from the instant everywhere fills every niche of our consciousness,
crowding out knowledge and understanding. For while knowledge is steady and
cumulative, information is random and miscellaneous," writes Daniel Boorstin.
The texture of life is not contained in facts.
What
will we remember of our education? Not the factoids, not the pie charts, not
the elements, not the naming and labeling of parts nothing, in fact,
that has no resonance to real life. What we learn will be useful and important
only insofar as it affects the way we see the world, and our ability to place
ourselves in it. The darkness of ignorance is more prevalent today, in this
so-called age of information, than it was before the industrial revolution.
We know this in our hearts, and we must first admit it in order to have any
hope of learning anything worthwhile. As Bruce Catton put it so well when
he described his own early days of learning:
"We
lived in a time of great expectations. We believed in ourselves and in the
future, and we welcomed all of the omens that were good
However, bookish
knowledge did not necessarily mean much. We lived by our emotions rather than
by our brains, and although we did not know where we were going we trusted
the future
The daily routine, in study hall and classroom, was real
enough, certainly; but so was the flood of moonlight that sometimes lay on
the countryside at night, turning the plain gravel road south into a white
highway that wound through enchanted meadows that would not be there at all
when daylight returned."